District Judge Eligibility: Supreme Court Article 233
District Judge Eligibility: Supreme Court Article 233
According to the Supreme Court's interpretation of Article 233, who is eligible for direct recruitment as a District Judge?
- Only advocates
- Only in-service officers
- Both advocates and officers
- Only retired judges
Explanation in English
Correct Answer Explanation
The Supreme Court recently held that judicial officers with a combined experience of 7 years as an advocate and in judicial service will be eligible for direct recruitment as District Judges. The Court interpreted Article 233 to permit both advocates and in-service candidates to be appointed, extending the 7-year practice criterion to judicial officers as well. This ruling broadens the pool of eligible candidates, recognizing both legal practitioners and existing judicial officers with relevant experience.
Incorrect Options Analysis
- Only advocates: This is incorrect because the Supreme Court's interpretation explicitly includes judicial officers.
- Only in-service officers: This is incorrect as advocates are also eligible, provided they meet the 7-year practice criterion.
- Only retired judges: This option is incorrect as the ruling pertains to direct recruitment, not the re-appointment of retired judges.
जिला न्यायाधीश पात्रता: सुप्रीम कोर्ट अनुच्छेद 233
सुप्रीम कोर्ट द्वारा अनुच्छेद 233 की व्याख्या के अनुसार, जिला न्यायाधीश के रूप में सीधी भर्ती के लिए कौन पात्र है?
- केवल अधिवक्ता
- केवल सेवारत अधिकारी
- अधिवक्ता और अधिकारी दोनों
- केवल सेवानिवृत्त न्यायाधीश
Explanation in Hindi
सही उत्तर स्पष्टीकरण
Supreme Court ने हाल ही में फैसला सुनाया कि 7 साल के advocate और judicial service के combined experience वाले judicial officers, District Judges के रूप में direct recruitment के लिए eligible होंगे। Court ने Article 233 की व्याख्या की कि advocates और in-service candidates दोनों को नियुक्त करने की अनुमति है, 7-year practice criterion को judicial officers पर भी लागू किया गया। यह ruling eligible candidates के pool को बढ़ाता है, legal practitioners और relevant experience वाले existing judicial officers दोनों को मान्यता देता है।
गलत विकल्पों का विश्लेषण
- केवल अधिवक्ता (Only advocates): यह गलत है क्योंकि Supreme Court की व्याख्या में स्पष्ट रूप से judicial officers शामिल हैं।
- केवल सेवारत अधिकारी (Only in-service officers): यह गलत है क्योंकि अधिवक्ता भी eligible हैं, बशर्ते वे 7-year practice criterion को पूरा करते हों।
- केवल सेवानिवृत्त न्यायाधीश (Only retired judges): यह विकल्प गलत है क्योंकि यह ruling direct recruitment से संबंधित है, न कि retired judges की फिर से नियुक्ति से।